Tagged
London Arbitration 10/11
Charterparty – Freight – Tanker voyage charter – Freight payable at Worldscale rate – Worldscale not having any rate for discharge port – Charterers subsequently agreeing to pay port expenses – Whether separate agreement – Amoco Claims Clause – Owners’ claim for port charges/ freight not presented within stipulated period – Whether claim time-barred
The vessel, a VLCC, was chartered for a voyage which included discharging at Caofeidian, China. Freight was to be payable at the rate of WS160. Normally Worldscale (WS) rates included an element for port costs. However, Worldscale did not have an established rate for Caofeidian.
Forgotten password?
if you have a subscription to lmln.com, but have forgotten your password, please fill in the box below and your log-in details will be emailed to you.
To read the rest of this article please log in below.
Request a free trial
You can request a free trial to Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter. This includes your personal copy of the latest issue.Click here to request a free trial.Subscribe now
Start benefiting from our expert analysis straight away. Click here to subscribe. A subscription provides the latest hardcopy sent to you ten times a year, access to our online archive, and full access to the site.Log in
Dec 13 2011
Send To Colleague
Email the Editor
X v Y - QBD (Com Ct)(Burton J) - 9 February 2011
(2011) 815 LMLN 2
London Arbitration 9/11
(2011) 833 LMLN 2
London Arbitration 7/11
(2011) 828 LMLN 1
London Arbitration 3/11
(2011) 825 LMLN 2

