Taigo Ltd v China Master Shipping Ltd - Hong Kong SAR Court of First Instance Construction and Arbitration Proceedings (Saunders J) - 9 July 2010
Arbitration - "Documents only" hearing - No direction for split hearing on liability and quantum - Arbitrators determining liability in favour of counterclaiming respondent but leaving quantum to be dealt with in separate hearing - Whether arbitrators erred - Whether leave to appeal award should be granted to claimant
Taigo brought arbitration proceedings against China Master in relation to disputes which had arisen under a time charter. China Master counterclaimed damages for wrongful repudiation of the charter by Taigo. The arbitration was deal with on a “documents only” basis. On 20 March 2010 the tribunal published a “First Final Award”. It determined that China Master’s counterclaim succeeded on liability but that because the tribunal did not have sufficient particulars or evidence to make a determination on the quantum of damages recoverable by China Master, the question of damages would be left over to be dealt with “in another Final Award”.
Forgotten password?
if you have a subscription to lmln.com, but have forgotten your password, please fill in the box below and your log-in details will be emailed to you.Request a free trial
You can request a free trial to Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter. This includes your personal copy of the latest issue.Click here to request a free trial.Subscribe now
Start benefiting from our expert analysis straight away. Click here to subscribe. A subscription provides the latest hardcopy sent to you ten times a year, access to our online archive, and full access to the site.Log in
May 13 2011

