A and Ors v B and Anr - QBD (Comm Ct)(Flaux J) - 15 September 2011
Arbitration - Award - Application to remove arbitrator on grounds of apparent bias - Arbitrator instructed as counsel in other litigation by firm of solicitors acting in arbitration - Whether unconscious bias - Arbitrator failing to disclose his involvement in the other litigation until after hearing of arbitration - Whether serious irregularity - Arbitration Act 1996, sections 24 and 68
On 31 March 2009 the first defendant (“B”) commenced arbitration against the claimants (“A”), pursuant to the Rules of the London Court of International Arbitration (“LCIA”) alleging breaches of a share and purchase agreement. At the time, A’s solicitors were SJ Berwin. B’s solicitors were Dewey & LeBoeuf. SJ Berwin suggested that the second defendant, a QC experienced in financial law (“X”), should be appointed as sole arbitrator. Dewey & LeBoeuf agreed.
Forgotten password?
if you have a subscription to lmln.com, but have forgotten your password, please fill in the box below and your log-in details will be emailed to you.Request a free trial
You can request a free trial to Lloyd's Maritime Law Newsletter. This includes your personal copy of the latest issue.Click here to request a free trial.Subscribe now
Start benefiting from our expert analysis straight away. Click here to subscribe. A subscription provides the latest hardcopy sent to you ten times a year, access to our online archive, and full access to the site.Log in
Oct 1 2011
